Wanna know if a study really holds up?

The Researcher will read the paper, check the methodology, label weak claims, and explain limitations right on the page.

The page stays visible while the agent reads, streams the audit, and keeps follow-up answers tied to the source content.

What it analyzes

Peer review quality, without the wait

Methodology check

Sample size, data sources, statistical methods, timeframe — with flags for underpowered samples and missing controls.

Claims labeled

Each major claim marked: Well-supported, Partially supported, Speculative, or Contradicted — with evidence cited.

Limitations found

Both stated weaknesses and unstated ones apparent from the methodology — things the authors glossed over.

Reliability verdict

Reliable / Treat with caution / Significant concerns — specific reasons in plain language, not academic jargon.

What people say

★★★★★

"As a researcher, this is a game changer. It spots methodology flaws I would've missed in a quick read. I run every study through it now."

Dr. Dana L.

Academic Researcher

★★★★★

"Started running every paper I cite through the Researcher. Already caught two studies with serious sample size issues I'd missed."

Yuki N.

PhD Candidate

Other Use Cases

Also included

All inside one extension, free to start.